The CDC and FDA's blatant Lies about VAERS and COVID Vaccines
Here is definitive proof they are either lying about the safety of COVID shots, all vaccines, or maybe both.
In this article I will prove that the CDC, FDA, and NIH, beyond any shadow of a doubt, are all all lying about vaccine safety. I will use their own references to VAERS and the safety data from their websites to demonstrate their lies and hypocrisy. I will show that there is absolutely no way they can continue to promote any vaccine as safe without contradicting their blatant disregard of the VAERS data in regards to COVID shots. By this same measure of proof, the fake Fact Checkers who are constantly telling us that over 1 million adverse VAERS events from mRNA vaccines doesn’t prove causation will have to concede that there is really no way of knowing if any vaccine is safe because this is what they use to tell you it is.
For starters, let us look at how ridiculously bad it looks for COVID vaccines and “fact checkers” making the ‘no-causality’ claim when you use comparative data of COVID vaccine adverse events vs. other vaccines. Below, is a chart I made with data taken directly from VAERS comparing adverse of events from COVID shots over an 18 month period vs. Flu Shots over a 30-year period.
Adverse Events Reported - COVID Shots vs. Flu Shots
As you can see, COVID shots have reported 127x as many adverse events! If that’s not alarming enough, consider the fact that we’re comparing a 15 month period to 30 years! That averages out to be 77,926 adverse events per month for COVID shots vs. 25 per month for flu shots. Based on VAERS data, the COVID jab is 3,117 x more dangerous than the yearly flu shot. To be fair, the flu shot is probably one of the more safe vaccines among the many dozens of different types of vaccines. For instance, the MMR vaccine returns a result of 86,000 adverse events in a 30 year period. That averages out to be 238 events per month versus 77,926, meaning the COVID vaccine is only potentially 327 times more dangerous than getting an MMR vaccine. Does that make you feel better? I freely acknowledge that there is an underreporting factor at play here, but that holds true for all vaccines so it makes no difference for sake of comparison. No matter how you look at it, this is an alarming and shocking indictment against these shots. Yet, according to CDC and fake-fact checkers this data isn’t enough to warrant any concern! But, are the CDC and fake fact-checkers consistent about the stated role and importance of VAERS with other vaccines? No. As I will show, VAERS is the first safety monitoring strategy listed in every single one of their online vaccine safety documents. Doing a Google search for flu vaccine and safety will yield the following explanation from the NIH about vaccine safety:
“In Europe, vaccine safety is monitored by the Vaccine Adverse Event Surveillance and Communication (VAESCO) consortium, and in the United States by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) through the routine use of two surveillance systems: the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) and the Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD).16”
Note that the CDC’s Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) is the very first method mentioned. You will find this to be true everywhere you search the terms vaccine safety and -name your vaccine here. By the way, Europe’s VAESCO is just as alarming as the United States’.
Doing a Google search for, “Is the MMR Vaccine Safe?” yielded the following at the top of the page:
“How CDC Monitors Vaccine Safety CDC and FDA monitor the safety of vaccines after they are approved or authorized. If a problem is found with a vaccine, CDC and FDA will inform health officials, health care providers, and the public. CDC uses 3 systems to monitor vaccine safety: The Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS): an early warning system, co-managed by CDC and FDA, to monitor for potential vaccine safety problems. Anyone can report possible vaccine side effects to VAERS. The Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD): a collaboration between CDC and 9 health care organizations that conducts vaccine safety monitoring and research. The Clinical Immunization Safety Assessment (CISA) Project: a partnership between CDC and several medical research centers that provides expert consultation and conducts clinical research on vaccine-associated health risks.”
Note that VAERS is at the top of the list.
Another search for vaccine safety returned the following result and chart:
“Three Phases of Vaccine Trials
https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/parents/infographics/journey-of-child-vaccine.html”
Once again, note that VAERS is at the top of the list.
Not until I did a search for one of the more controversial vaccines, Gardasil, did the disclaimer for causality appeared:
"Top 6 Things to Know about VAERS https://www.cdc.gov/vaccinesafety/ensuringsafety/monitoring/vaers/index.html 1. VAERS is a national vaccine safety surveillance program that helps to detect unusual or unexpected reporting patterns of adverse events for vaccines. 2. VAERS is a passive surveillance system, meaning it relies on people sending in reports of their experiences after vaccination. 3. VAERS accepts reports from anyone, including patients, family members, healthcare providers and vaccine manufacturers. 4. Healthcare providers and vaccine manufacturers are required by law to report certain events after vaccination. 5. VAERS is not designed to determine if a vaccine caused or contributed to an adverse event. A report to VAERS does not mean the vaccine caused the event. 6. If VAERS detects a pattern of adverse events following vaccination, other vaccine safety monitoring systems conduct follow up studies. "
Despite point # 5 (which is all too familiar of an excuse by now), VAERS is still the very first thing on their list they use to assess safety. So, it would appear that VAERS is their golden standard for assessing safety of their vaccines. As to point # 5, here are a few fair questions to ask them: “Since 1.2 million reported ill-effects from COVID shots have been reported in just 15 months, what follow-up studies are currently under-way? Why have we not heard about them? Are they being ignored or are you just not willing to share? Do tens of thousands of heart-related events, neurological and brain issues indicate enough of a pattern to warrant follow-up studies as indicated in point # 6? If not, then what would? Giving the CDC, FDA, and NIH the benefit of the doubt, we must conclude they are very busy, indeed!
So, to defend my original claim: Either CDC, FDA, NIH, etc., are lying about the safety of all vaccines or they are only lying about COVID vaccines. Likely, they are lying about both, but adverse events from mRNA shots have given them no place to run or hide. VAERS is at the very top of every list they use to preach the safety of flu shots, MMR, and virtually every other vaccine that has been around for the last 30 years. How can they on the one hand tell us to ignore these alarming deaths and adverse events of mRNA vaccines as reported by VAERS Reporting System while continuing to use that same system to assure us these other vaccines are completely safe? If VAERS is worth anything at all, it clearly proves COVID shots are to be avoided at all costs. If over 1 million cases and 25,000 deaths prove nothing, then VAERS is completely worthless both ways and the CDC, FDA, NIH, HHS, etc., etc., have absolutely no proof that any vaccine we have ever received is safe.
You might be interested in this:
The AP's hatchet job on RFK, Jr. is a new low for mainstream journalism.
https://billricejr.substack.com/p/hatchet-job-on-rfk-jr-is-new-low
Fear was the key to All Things Covid and that fear was not supported by the data or the statistics. A deep dive into some of the mortality statistics by age, race, state and country.
https://billricejr.substack.com/p/for-overwhelming-majority-of-americans